Silhouette of Chess Parent

A Parent's-eye-view of the "Chess Circuit"

We asked a parent who is currently doing the rounds of various qualifying events to present a parent's eye view............

NB. The views expressed here are personal and are not those of Sussex Junior Chess.

Tales of the Unexpected... or battle scars of a chess parent!

Fortunately I was brought up on a culture of debunking urban myths and during my short time as a chess circuit parent, my goodness I have heard and seen a few!  One would think living in the internet age (just google it!) with a danger of drowning in chess websites, that all the information for your child to progress or otherwise would be at your fingertips..............alas not!   I have yet to discover the ‘idiots’ guide’ to being a chess parent, so I thought it would be helpful to offer one or two helpful (non-playing) tips in no particular order, and deep apologies to those who have swallowed the chess parents handbook of ‘insider knowledge but never to be spoken out loud’.

Tip 1:
There is a big difference between Grand Prix’s (GPs) and training days.  GPs are graded (see below) and the scores are cumulative ending in the best four of six scores in a seasonal competition; training days are not graded but are great days to learn from experts, and are exceptional value for money.  Both events also give the opportunity for your child to make friends and kick a football about.

Tip 2:
Gradings are very important to your child’s progress;  do visit the ECF website which has a very user-friendly guide for the facts.  It is worth checking when entering a competition whether is it ‘graded’ or not.  Not every local organiser chooses to make this clear.

Tip 3:
ECF equals English Chess Federation, the governing body of English Chess (not sure about the Welsh or Cornish?).  Do visit their website for all sorts of useful information, including a very helpful calendar of events: www.englishchess.org.uk

Tip 4:
The ‘London Tournament’ is a big occasion for talented players of all ages; just because your child did not qualify at your ‘local’ qualifying tournament all is not lost!  Be aware that your child can attend any number of qualifying tournaments (fact: there is no limit); See www.ljcc.co.uk for further information on the 23 or so qualifying tournaments.

Tip 5:
Food.  There is an astonishing variance in food offered at different venues; some offer very nourishing healthy options, others ‘ping’ food at its worst.  We always take a Sainsbury munch bag just in case. 

Tip 6:
Other parents.  I have learnt more about the chess world from other parents, who in the main are very keen in help.  If in doubt chat over a cup of tea and ask!

The chess circuit can be demanding, draining but of course very rewarding seeing your child achieve or excel at their level of competence.  I have had a lot of fun myself but as you may have gathered from this piece the onus from the ‘chess world’ at the beginning is very much on you.

Compare and contrast – a light hearted look at chess tournaments around the Empire

Readers may be interested to know how Sussex Junior Chess fares when compared to other chess venues. 

You know the score: friendly welcome from Jonathan, healthy options available throughout the day especially for those who are partial to bacon sandwiches and donuts; plenty of power points for the lap top wielding yummy mummy’s;  and of course a well run, well priced and friendly chess competition with young arbiters who remain awake for all 6 rounds.

This review covers not only the tournament itself but the more important things to the pushy parents like me:  web sites, food, car parking, access to power points and so on.  So, if you have a dull moment please read on..............

Tournament A - Home Counties location
Website: friendly and informative but slow to upload match results (unlike SJC!)
Food: standard ‘ping’ fare but good working class tea (no Earl Grey sadly)
Car parking: free
Access to power points: none!
Chess tournament: Well organised, very experienced arbiters; excellent running publication of results and cross-tables.
Verdict: 7/10

Tournament B - Going West
Website: very basic and obviously steam powered.
Food: excellent range of fresh food
Car parking:  good but 3 minutes walk away from the venue
Access to power points: plenty but had to use the ‘German towel’ principle
Chess tournament:   Well organised, experienced arbiters, reasonable running publication of results and cross-tables.
Verdict: 7/10

Tournament C - East of Eden
Website: very slick with smooth graphics but served as a smokescreen
Food: typical of Romanian state railways in the 1980’s
Car parking: car park flooded and litter everywhere
Access to power points: a struggle but very sharp SJC elbows succeeded
Chess tournament: No pairing cards or boards; No table numbers;  Arbiters’ picked from those sitting in the parents room;  on-going results dried up after round 3.
Verdict: 3/10

Tournament D - Nationally significant event
Website: more of bulletin board
Food: Thank God for the local Sainsbury's!
Car parking: expensive but found a £5 note on the floor!
Access to power points: the grumpy staff had placed red masking tape over all the power points and then rejoiced in putting a notice up to say so!
Chess tournament:   Well organised, very experienced arbiters, excellent running publication of results and cross-tables.
Verdict: 8/10